Thursday, May 7, 2009

Newsweek Nails It!: Obama is a Marxist!

Out of the mouth of babes and the mainstream media, every once in a while you get profundity.

My uncle reads Newsweek, I don't. So he saved the February 16, 2009 copy for me, and it had THIS on the cover:

Note the self-conscious mockery of actual socialist symbolism:

Now of course, if a Conservative makes this same observation, he is a "right-wing extremist." Everyone from Mike Savage to Sean Hannity to Joe the Plumber to John McCain have been criticized for utilizing the word in connection with The One.

And yes, the story on the inside, written by Jon Meacham and Evan Thomas, ties this "socialism" that "we all are" now to the policy of Barack Hussein Muhammad bin Obama. The story specifically states that Obama is going much further than even the free-spending Bush while "reversing Bill Clinton's end of big government" [sic]. And the article casts its own lot with Obama's spending-like-water goals, asserting (without proof) that "an aging population and global warming and higher energy costs will demand more taxing and spending."

Of course, the story is strangely silent about the fact that the retirement savings of the aging population was wiped out by Democratic social engineering in the housing market, that high energy costs will be caused by Socialist global warming nonsense, and that, well, that global warming is so much Socialist nonsense designed specifically not to respond to a real threat, but rather to put the brakes on the free market and transfer power to national governments and international non-governmental organizations. But all that is beside the point! The good news is, we're all Socialists with the advent of The One.

A moment of honesty (unintended, I am sure) was induldged in by our Newsweek heroes, when they note "The catch [of all this expanding Socialist governance] is that more government intrusion in the economy will almost surely limit growth (as it has in Europe, where a big welfare state has caused chronic high unemployment)." Emphasis added.

The article concludes: "Growth has always been America's birthright and saving grace." But look for that growth to stop, Komrade!

In an adjacent story by Michael Freedman (who seems to barely be able to restrain his orgasmic delight long enough to type his story), the claim is made that the long-term effects of Obama's policies "will be a steady drift toward what could be called a European model of governance, regulation, and paternalism. Already, big government is on the rise - projected public spending figures show the United States will move ever closer to European averages over the next two years." The U.S. government will begin regulating "with big brother vigilance," turning entire industries into "virtual wards of the state." Of course, restraint is not always a good thing, as we learn when Freedman indulges in some journalistic cheerleading, "This is all likely to prove very popular if the conventional wisdom [read: the hopes of the mainstream media elites] is right."

How is that whole hopey-changey thing working out for ya? Oddly enough, all these ideas have been tried before. But rather than being "tried and true," it seems they are "tried and tattered."


  1. the libertarian party is the party of pot, perversion and the murder of innocent Americans.

    That is not what Yah'shua (jesus) taught.

    shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

  2. Thanks for your valuable and thoughtful reply, which has absolutely nothing to do with the blog entry.

    However, while I agree that perversion and abortion has nothing to do with Christ, I would, as a libertarian, also assert the following:

    1) The New Testament is quite clear that morality and governmental policy do not exactly match (Acts 5:29).

    2) Genuine righteousness is rendered freely to God, not compelled by the government.

    3) There are plenty of pro-life Libertarians. As to what issue of "perversion" has you upset, I can personally testify that I oppose homosexual marriages, but if you have something else on your mind.... At any rate, while society should not endorse homosexual couplings (this is why I oppose the idea), the New Testament recognizes the existence of such sin and proposes a moral, not a governmental, solution (I Cor. 6:9-11).

    4) As for "pot," explain to me the rationale for outlawing pot while allowing the sale of booze? Laws that are not consistent and reasonable invite contempt for the law.

    You are welcome.